Hiroshima: Remembering the atomic bomb

Hiroshima: Remembering the atomic bomb

We have mixed views about the two atomic bomb attacks on Japan. Both our Fathers were caught-up in the Pacific War and arguably would not have survived during a prolonged invasion of Japan.

And in defence of the decision to use the bombs, it needs to be remembered that 1945 was already a time of mass slaughter. In March, 100,000 died in a single Tokyo bombing raid. And the Battle of Okinama was ritualised killing with some 240,000 soldiers and civilians slain.

But going round the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, reading the text, the inference was clearly made that America, having developed the bomb at great expense (the Manhattan Project), and fearing the Soviet Union’s global expansion, wanted to detonate it for a bit of “shock and awe” and so delayed offering Japan acceptable surrender terms until after August 6th and August 9th.

Surely, it’s more than ironic that a weapon today justified by its deterrent factor, was launched into the world with no warning and no ultimatum. 140,000 people in Hiroshima died horrendously within four months, whilst armchair generals wrote congratulatory memos.

The vision of the museum is to call for a worldwide ban on nuclear weapons, as proposed by the July 7th United Nations motion signed by 122 countries, but not the existing nuclear powers, including of course North Korea.

In the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum, a watch stopped at the time of the explosion, 8.15am

2 thoughts on “Hiroshima: Remembering the atomic bomb

  1. Without doubt, the Peace Memorial Museum is one of the most moving museums one could visit. It’s impact on me has been long lasting.


  2. Hello, you’re blog is quite interesting!
    The example of Nazi Germany had shown that an indoctrinated population and army would resist until allied troops literally arrived at their doorstep. The axis powers leaders were very ready to scrape the bottom of the barrel, e.g. one of my grandmas acquaintances was drafted as a 14- or 15 year-old if I remember correctly.
    So after ending the war in Europe invading Japan would have meant to risk the loss of many American lives, and probably Japanese casualties in numbers many times over those of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    Seen from a World War II contemporaries perspective the usage of the bombs was justified I think.
    The other option would have been to fight against a fanatic enemy who was ready to send people on suicide attacks and use women and children in battle.


Thanks for reading. We'd love to hear your thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s